Armored vehicles, assault weapons, tear and gas and “less lethal” weapons?
CCPD (agenda item PH-2).Because the use of military equipment increases the risk to public safety and civil rights (see studies listed here), California Assembly Bill AB481 requires law enforcement agencies to adopt strict policies for their use.CCPD has submitted a loosely worded, non-compliant policy to City Council that will be discussed at tomorrow’s meeting.
Because of the serious danger of these weapons we urge everyone to tell Council why CCPD has written a BAD POLICY that they should not accept.There are many specific reasons listed in this breakdown of CCPD’s second draft, but we see a few major areas where serious risk to the public is not addressed or the process appears to be in bad faith.
1) Lack of specificity:In several places the document lists uses of these weapons with the statement “including but not limited to”. This effectively authorizes ALL uses.
.2) Lack of Accountability:It is California law that CCPD policy needs to include a “mechanism of compliance” such as right of the public to sue when the usage is in violation of policy. This is not specified in the CCPD draft.There is no firm response time to complaints about violations of policy, also a requirement of the law.
3) Bad faith:The CCPD webpage is dated March 11, in compliance with the 30 day advance notice of a public hearing. But there have been 3 different versions of the document linked, the most recent version on April 5th.
There is no need for CCPD to rush this policy as AB481 allows for usage of military equipment for 180 days after the first policy submission.
Mayor Thomas Small, Vice Mayor Meghan Sahli-Wells, Councilmembers Daniel Lee and Alex Fisch; all present. Councilmember Göran Eriksson participated via phone from Sweden
Mayor Thomas Small shared that he, Councilmember Daniel Lee, Police Chief Scott Bixby, Public Works Department Director Charles Herbertson, and the other city staff appreciated being able to attend a marvelous luncheon and tour of the King Fahad Mosque in Culver City. He said the Mosque leaders and members that hosted them were wonderfully hospitable, and he appreciated being able to learn more about the work they are doing, some of which is internationally known. Mayor Small also praised the beauty of the Mosque itself.
Several members of the Environmental Programs and Operations Division of the Public Works Department gave an informative presentation about the City Transfer Station Stormwater Diversion and Rain Garden project completed in January and June of this year; the focus was on the technology advancements that have been made. The transfer station collects all trash and recycling from residential and commercial sources and sends them to a landfill, for composting, or to be recycled. Drainage for the waste material that is screened and filtered is discharged to Ballona Creek. Special bio cleaning processes and biofilters are used to remove bacteria, nutrients, metal, trash, oil, and grease before it is safely released in the rain garden on site. Councilmember Alex Fisch pointed out that we are now paying for the disposal of blue bin contents, instead of getting paid for recycling, as China is no longer interested in our dirty materials. Councilmember Daniel Lee stated pointedly that what we need to do is reduce the amount of waste we produce.
After Mayor Thomas Small learned of the opportunity, Culver City applied for a CivicSpark Water Fellow, and Jonathan Dolan was chosen to conduct research regarding the Ballona Creek Revitalization Project. Jonathan Dolan explained that the goal of the project is to enhance Ballona Creek; the environment, community use, and riparian improvements. A 200-page atlas was created, feasibility for bike path upgrades, and eight projects were identified. Ballona Creek Renaissance and Jim Lamm were named as being especially helpful sources of information. Mayor Small explained that AmeriCorps provides the grant funding for CivicSpark Fellows and said that Culver City is currently interviewing prospects for next year’s Fellow in order to plan for implementation of the projects identified by the research. Jonathan Dolan was commended for his excellent work, earlier in the evening. Action Item: Ban of New Offshore Oil and Gas Activities off Pacific Coast
Resolution Supporting a Ban New Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling, Seismic Oil and Gas Exploration, Fracking, and other Well Stimulation in Federal and State Waters off the Pacific Coast and No New Federal Oil and Gas Leasing in all U.S. Waters
This item was surprisingly contentious, though it was handily adopted on a 4:1 vote, with Councilmember Göran Eriksson abstaining on the grounds that this was not a “local issue.”
There were 11 speakers during the public comment period; Culver City locals Aura Walker and Khin Khin Gyi spoke in favor of the ban, and then nine members of CREED LA spoke against the resolution, citing the value of “safe drilling” because of job and economic benefits. Almost all of these speakers talked about wanting to live the “American Dream.” CREED LA represents itself as an organization advocating for workers and working families and their website says their support comes from a number of trade unions. They also claim to be committed to environmentalism, green buildings, and preventing ocean pollution, which doesn’t square with the statements of their members at this meeting in favor of new oil drilling.
Councilmember Alex Fisch pointed out that the resolution calls for a ban on new drilling only and doesn’t threaten the jobs of any workers today. He also said the reason for this ban is that we don’t have decades to protect ourselves from climate change and that the dangers posed by rising waters are already causing harm. “We are facing an existential threat.”
Councilmember Daniel Lee said he is ally of labor, and the solution is not to expand oil drilling but to invest in green jobs. He noted that China has been moving assertively to adopt solar energy for ten years. “True justice [for workers] is transitioning from our present dependence on fossil fuels to a path that prevents us from destruction.” Daniel Lee called for us to work with the labor community to push the green economy forward. Councilmember Göran Eriksson said he may “personally agree” on this matter, but he does not see this as our primary responsibility. He found it “inappropriate” for our City Council to spend time on this resolution and said he would abstain because it is not a “Culver City-centric” issue. Vice Mayor Meghan Sahli-Wells said that several cities around us have weighed in on this resolution. She explained that because our town is near the coast, and because of the vital nature of California’s coastal identity, we have a responsibility to support the ban. Vice Mayor Sahli-Wells talked about the outstanding opportunities we have to act in the interest of working families. She noted that Culver City voted to use 100% renewable energy by joining the Clean Power Alliance and said we’ve been talking with IBEW (International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers). “We are committed today to the healthy jobs of the future. These are jobs that aren’t going to other countries.” Vice Mayor Sahli-Wells urged CREED LA to look into being a part of the new, green economy. “It’s not a zero-sum game; it’s not either/or. We can create new opportunities for your families and ours.”
“Almost every week, I find myself part of a press conference responding in shock, dismay and resoluteness to the horrible images and actions coming out of Washington against our immigrant brothers and sisters… As James Baldwin said to Angela Davis, ‘if they take you in the morning, they will be coming for us that night.’”
~from Assemblymember Sydney Kamlager-Dove’s summer edition e-newsletter
On Tuesday evening, July 17, Sydney Kamlager-Dove, our newly elected Assemblymember from the 54th District, hosted an Open House at her District office on Crenshaw Blvd. Sydney has been in office just three months (she won a Special Election held in April) and will need to run again in November, but she has already been very active as our representative!
Sydney spoke briefly to the standing room only crowd, introducing staff and interns, including her district director, Joy Masha. Sydney stated unequivocally that she is committed to listening to all voices. She stressed that her office is open 9am-5pm daily, and invited constituents to be in touch with concerns and questions. She listed upcoming events, and said volunteer opportunities, an internship program, and a speaker’s series would all be announced soon. Sydney said there would be “Fitness with the Member” events to promote public health that would include cycling, yoga, and blood sugar checks. She also said her office would hold a workshop about how to apply for state commissions and seek appointments from the governor. Sydney will be returning to Sacramento at the end of this month to work in the capitol through August 31 when the deadline arrives for bills to be passed by the Legislature.
Sydney shared that she had been able to get an additional $4 million for the CA Chafee Grants for Foster Youth program included in the $200 billion dollar state budget, as well as $1.2 billion for economic infusion in Inglewood to improve outdoor space and build a community center which supports her commitment to workforce development. She took a first (unsuccessful) stab at closing oil wells, but will be back at it again during the next legislative session. Sydney authored and whipped the votes to pass a resolution supporting Planned Parenthood in response to the continued assault on women by the federal Administration and to remind the State to continue to fund women’s healthcare. She spoke about efforts to protect Net Neutrality, assuring those gathered of her commitment to the cause.
Sydney asked her constituents to let her know what matters to us; from affordable housing, the pressure renters are facing, Internet equality, to environmental issues.
Culver City residents present at the Open House included Culver City Mayor Thomas Small, Culver City Chamber of Commerce President Colin Diaz, Deborah Weinrauch, Debbie Wallace, Cynthia Hart, and Rich Kissel.
While those gathering at the event were mingling, Thomas Small remarked, “I had a very good conversation with Sydney recently. I am looking forward to collaborating in a new and positive way [with our Assemblymember] on infrastructure, policing, and sustainability in Culver City.”
To contact Assemblymember Sydney Kamlager-Dove, visit her website.
On August 9th, at 6:30 pm, the Culver City Police Department will make a presentation on the Unmanned Arial Vehicle Pilot Program (Drones). Community members are encouraged to attend and offer their views and opinion on this program and policy.
We have an opportunity to question the necessity for militaristic tools. Is our police department a community resource ? If so, then is there a compelling need for war-like policing tools?
Culver City Evaluating Innovative Last-Mile Transportation Solutions
Bird, the first company to participate in the City of Culver City’s six-month trial period for electric scooter sharing, implemented a soft launch today in Culver City.
To encourage residents to ride safely, a community safety event will be held on Monday, July 30 at 12:00 p.m., allowing the public to test the scooters, learn the rules of scooter usage, and hear more about the City’s transportation goals. During the event, Culver City Mayor Thomas Small and Vice Mayor Meghan Sahli-Wells will be present to talk to press about the city’s transportation goals and encourage citizens to ride responsibly. Bird representatives will also be present to provide free helmets to the first 100 people and demonstrate how to ride and park a scooter.
WHAT: Community safety event celebrating electric scooter soft launch in Culver City
WHEN: Monday, July 30 from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
WHERE: City of Culver City Transportation Facility – 4343 Duquesne Avenue (at Jefferson Boulevard), Culver City, CA, 90232
WHO: Thomas Small, Mayor, City of Culver City; Meghan Sahli-Wells, Vice Mayor, City of Culver City; Bird, Inc. Representatives; and Members of the Public
Electric scooter share has recently appeared in cities around the world. Like many cities, Culver City is now studying the best way to address this new transportation model. In an effort to improve mobility and decrease carbon emissions in Culver City, the City Council decided on July 9, 2018 to allow dockless electric stand-up scooters in the City via a six-month interim operating agreement. The city’s interim operating agreement regulating electric scooters reflects its broader mission to improve communities by getting people out of cars to reduce traffic and cut carbon emissions.
“We are committed to both innovation and equity in addressing the crisis of mobility in our city and our region and to provide the best, most reliable transportation options available to our community. These dynamic collaborations with innovative companies and new technologies will support and enhance our vital public transit system and help meet the transportation demands of our community,” said Culver City Mayor Thomas Small.
“Scooter share offers a convenient mobility option for the first and last mile connection with public transit. With alternative transportation services such as transit and scooter share, we hope to better manage mobility and improve the quality of life for those who live, work, and visit Culver City.” said Art Ida, Transportation Director for the City of Culver City.
Scooter riders are required to wear a helmet, must be over the age of 18 with a valid drivers’ license, and riding on the sidewalk is prohibited. Find out more about scooters in Culver City, provide feedback, follow the issue and receive updates on the City’s website. Through its agreement with the City, Bird is required to respond to questions and concerns from the public about their scooters, and to ensure that their scooters are not interfering with the safety and well-being of pedestrians, bicyclists, and other members of the public. Members of the public can contact bird by phone at 1-866-205-2442, via text message at (213) 344-0211 or by email.
Here’s a video of the last 5 minutes of the meeting of 3/13. The last few minutes are missing, but they are telling, see the transcript below for that last part.
Jim Clarke: This is a statement that I discussed earlier tonight with the Community Development Director and the City Attorney. Currently we’re scheduled to consider a community benefits proposal from the developer of the Fox Hills Plaza at our March 26th Council meeting. This is consistent with our policy in which the developer holds a community meeting and develops a Community Benefits Proposal which are presented to the council prior to the project being presented to the Planning Commission which is scheduled for April 12th. I have no way of knowing what the developer plans to present or how the Council react but should the process move forward on March 26th, I will ask for 3 nodding heads to agendize the special Council meeting on either April 17 or 18th to consider the Fox Hills Plaza Project. I want to give you a heads up about this possible placeholder. This project has been very contentious for a long time and I think we owe it to our residents to resolve this project one way or another rather than dragging it out farther. So it is my intention that depending on what we do on March 26 to possible ask us to agendize a special meeting on April 17th or 18th.
Meghan Sahli-Wells: I’m sorry this. We’re scheduled.. I just have a clarifying question. So we’re already scheduled to vote on this on April 12th on the Fox Hills…
Jim Clarke/Meghan Sahli-Wells: that’s the Planning Commission, ok..
Jim Clarke: The process that we .. our policy is that the Community Benefits Package comes to us for Council first before it goes to the Planning Commission for the entitlement hearing. We can decide if we are favorably disposed and we want to move the process forward then I’m suggesting that we go ahead and schedule our hearing on this project within the period of time after the Planning Commission.
Meghan Sahli-Wells: OK, so
Jim Clarke: If we decide not to adopt the Community Benefits Proposal then it’s moot and I wouldn’t bring it forward.
Jeff Cooper: Dependent on it going to the Planning Commission.
Jim Clarke: It’s still scheduled to go to the Planning Commission on the 12th but if the Community Benefits Package that is presented to us on the 26th, gets to a point where it really doesn’t seem to work there might be a re-scheduling of the whole Planning Commission hearing of which case then I would not make the motion to ask for..
Meghan Sahli-Wells: But what would be the discussion on for April 17th?
Jim Clarke: Would be the actual approval, it would have gone to the Planning Commission
Meghan Sahli-Wells: I understand.
Jim Clarke: we would actually be voting on the project.
Meghan Sahli-Wells: Ok so this happened with Entrada that in a lame duck Council there was the very controversial Entrada was voted on and so I think that it would be a travesty to do such a thing. A travesty.
Jim Clarke: Understand but I also think too on the other hand everything else on a new council is going to be involved. I mean, we’ve been with this project…
Meghans Sahli-Wells: No.
Jim Clarke: for the whole time.
Meghan Sahli-Wells: It will be a travesty.
Jim Clarke: It should be on us. Ok, we’ll see what we do on the 26th.
Question 1:Who did you vote for in the last presidential election?Answers start at: 1:16:29
Question 2: Do you own a gun or have you ever owned a gun? Are you a member of the NRA? Answers start at: 1:18:06
Question 3: With regards to the NRA booth at Fiesta La Ballona, in what do you place more value? Upholding the first amendment right to free speech or the majority of voices in your community who prefer that the NRA not be there? Answers start at: 1:19:50
Question 4: Marijuana is legal in California and so is buying a gun. Which should be easier to purchase in Culver City? Answers start at: 1:22:57
Question 5: Do you think the city should still issue concealed weapons permits? Answers start at: 1:24:36
Question 6: Do you support the national walkout day and, if so, will you walk with us the students on March 14? Answers start at: 1:26:50
Question 7: Do you think CCPD should train our teachers to be armed in classrooms or is that a really bad idea? Answers starts at: 1:29:16
Question 8: Students are being killed in classrooms across the country because of gun violence. What will you do to protect the citizens and families from a shooting occurring at a Culver City School so no one has to live in fear of not returning home. Answers start at: 1:32:40
Question 9: So far we have three shops in Culver City that sell guns, all of which are near schools. Would you allow other shops to sell guns if they wanted to? Answers start at: 1:35:50
Question 10: If you had to be on a desert island with one of your fellow candidates, who would you want it to be and why? Answers start at: 1:18:06
Question 11:What thing do you admire most in each other? Answers start at: 1:40:53
Question 12:If you could have any famous band play at your city council inauguration ball who would that be? Answers start at: 1:43:24
Question 13: Elliot: Do you think Americans should learn more than one language?” Answers start at: 1:44:52
Question 14: 1:46:58“Where do you get your news?” Answers start at: 1:46:58
Question 15: Isreal, “If you were elected to the council, what would you want the city to remember you for?” Answers start at: 1:49:14
Question 16:1:52:01Miley, “Do you support the great wall that President Trump wants to build between the US and Mexico?” Answers start at: 1:52:01
Question 17: With the advent of automation here in Culver City, people in the parking structures at Trader Joe’s have been replaced. How would Culver City cope with this change and what would you do to protect jobs in Culver City?” “specifically low wage jobs.” Answers start at: 1:55:15
Question 18:Bella asks, How can you make facilities more accessible to the disabled in Culver City community? Answers start at: 1:58:14
Question 19:Zachary, Do you think fracking is worth the harm it may be causing? Why or why not? Answers start at: 2:01:31
Question 20: If oil companies approach you to invest money in the city, do you think CCUSD or CCEF should take the oil money if it benefits the students? Why or why not?” Answers start at: 2:04:41
Question 21: If you win, will you be a tweeting city council member?” Answers start at: 2:07:30
Question 23: Do you have a favorite current world leader? Answers start at: 2:11:48
Question 24: Cities including Boston, San Francisco and D.C. have all pledged to cut their green house gasses by 80% by the year 2050. How are you going to lower Culver City’s carbon footprint?” Answers start at: 2:13:32
Question 25: Are you OK with doing this for free?”Answers start at:2:16:18
Answers start at:The proposal to build 32 new fracking wells in the Inglewood Oil Field is deeply concerning to me and many students and citizens due to its posed environmental impacts and health impacts such as exposing our citizens to an increased risk of carcinogens found in the environment, seismic activity, and anthropologic climate change…If you are in opposition, what regulations would you support? Answers start at: 2:19:15
Question 27:What is your position in regards to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United Versus FEC decision and do you think it was justified. Do you agree with the role that this decision has given to money in politics? Answers start at: 2:23:01
Question 28:How did arts education shape you? (15 seconds or less). Answers start at: 2:25:46
Question 29: What book are you currently reading? Answers start at: 2:28:14
Question 30: What’s your favorite film shot in Culver City?Answers start at:2:29:46
Question 31: When you see a homeless person, do you give them food? money? or neither? Answers start at: 2:30:43
Introductory Statement: Daniel Lee: 26:43, Alex Fisch: 33:43, Albert Vera: 30:26
Question 1: What would you to provide affordable housing in Culver City? Answers start at 32:04
Question 2: Given the horrific school shooting today in Florida what is your position on gun control? Would you be willing to pass a resolution condemning gun violence and supporting common sense gun laws? Answers start at 36:20
Question 3: Will you act to protect Culver City from oil drilling and fracking by voting to require a .5 to 1 mile setback, a $2.5 billion disaster bond and a baseline survey of the health risks and property damage? Answers start at: 40:05
Question 4: What plans have you for relieving traffic congestion, particularly in light of the three new venues that will open soon? Answers start at: 43:40
Question 5: How many times have you voted in a Culver City election since you moved to Culver City? Answers start at: 47:30
Question 6: Do you have a plan to fight airplane noise? Answers start at: 50:00
Question 7: Will you accept campaign contributions from large corporations such as developers, oil companies, etc. Answers start at: 53:07
Question 8: What specifically will you propose to mitigate traffic congestion in Culver City now that so much new development has been approved and do you support the building height limit? Answers start at: 55:44
Question 9: How can Culver City be more LGBTQ friendly? Answers start at: 1:00:17
Question 10: Who are your main endorsers? Answers start at: 1:02:44
Question 11: Given that these are non-partisan elections, how you present citizens that do not agree with you on issues, before you take a representative position as a citizen and what ought to be best for the whole Culver City community? Answers start at 1:07:28
Introductions: Marcus Tiggs – 8:49, Alex Fisch 10:22, Albert Vera 12:03, Daniel Lee 13:24
Question 1: Residents of Fox Hills are concerned about parking and traffic related safety issues such as speeding. What solutions do you propose to address these issues in CC especially when the City is trying to increase housing? Answers start at 15:33
Question 2: What are your views regarding the upcoming implementation of Proposition 64 – that’s the marijuana legalization initiative in Culver City? Please specify any challenges or benefits you foresee when implemented and do you support Proposition A? Answers start at 23:57
Question 3: HSH management Proposal for the Fox Hills Plaza is to change the zoning from commercial to planned development for mixed use project with 762 residential units as well as retail space. The plan is for 960 parking spaces for all uses, employees, residents, shoppers and guests. The proposed density is double the requirement for units for mixed use which is 50 units per acre. If you were on the City Council right now and this plan was presented to you, how would you vote and what, if anything, would you like to see changed? Answers start at 32:26
Question 4: What proposals would you make or support so that present renters in Culver City will not be pushed out due to excessive rent increases? Answers start at 40:12
Question 5: What do you see as Culver City’s single most important issue today, challenge facing Culver City and what would you see as a possible solution? Answers start at 48:02
Question 6: Have you received any campaign contributions from developers? If so, which developers and if not, will you accept developer contributions to your campaign? Answers start at : 56:09
Question 7: With the record number of homeless in Los Angeles what strategies would you propose to address this issue in Culver City? Answers start at: 1:00:36
Question 8: City Council passed a smoking ban on all complexes without any enforcement mechanism. What will you do to give this ordinance more teeth? Answers start at: 1:09:10
Closing Statements: Marcus Tiggs: 1:15:45, Alex Fisch: 1:11:25, Albert Vera: 1:19:15, Daniel Lee: 1:20:31